Why does zaroff not consider his sport immoral in The Most Dangerous Game?

In "The Most Dangerous Game," General Zaroff does not consider his sport of hunting human prey to be immoral for several reasons:

1. Perceived Superiority: Zaroff sees himself and other "civilized" hunters as superior beings compared to the people they hunt. He views his victims as little more than animals, devoid of the same level of intelligence and morality as humans. This warped perception allows him to justify his actions and dismiss any ethical concerns.

2. Aristocratic Mindset: Zaroff comes from an aristocratic background and upholds the values and traditions of his social class. In this context, hunting and other forms of sport were considered prestigious activities that demonstrated one's wealth, power, and skill. Zaroff's aristocratic upbringing influences his moral compass and shapes his perception of what constitutes acceptable behavior.

3. Lack of Empathy: Zaroff lacks empathy and compassion for his victims. He views them as mere objects of entertainment, devoid of feelings, emotions, or intrinsic worth. This detachment from the humanity of his prey allows him to rationalize his actions and absolve himself of moral responsibility.

4. Desensitization: Zaroff has engaged in his sport for an extended period, which has desensitized him to the violence and cruelty involved. The thrill of the hunt and the satisfaction of overcoming challenges have become more significant to him than the moral implications of his actions.

It's important to note that Zaroff's moral code is severely flawed and is in direct conflict with the widely accepted ethical principles of society. His actions are driven by a sense of entitlement, arrogance, and a lack of regard for human life, making him a complex and morally ambiguous character.