1. Man vs Nature: Rainsford, a seasoned hunter, finds himself hunted by General Zaroff, a deranged aristocrat who considers hunting human beings the ultimate sport. This struggle between man and nature takes on metaphorical undertones, as Rainsford grapples with his own sense of morality and humanity.
2. Conflict of Ethics: Rainsford's initial thrill at being hunted turns to horror as he realizes the cruel and barbaric nature of Zaroff's game. He confronts an internal conflict between his instincts as a hunter and his growing moral revulsion against his situation.
3. Questioning Humanity: As Rainsford evades Zaroff's pursuit, he is forced to confront the primal and savage side of human nature that Zaroff represents. This shakes his belief in the inherent goodness of humanity and forces him to question his own capacity for violence.
4. Survival vs. Morality: Rainsford's internal conflict reaches a climax as he faces a life-or-death situation. He must choose between his desire for survival and the moral imperative to stand up against Zaroff's twisted sport.
5. Redemption: Ultimately, Rainsford emerges victorious over Zaroff, but his victory is bittersweet. He is burdened with the guilt of taking another human life, even though it was in self-defense. This internal conflict reflects the toll that his experience has taken on him, leaving him with a newfound understanding of the complexity and fragility of human existence.
In conclusion, the external conflicts in "The Most Dangerous Game" create a dynamic and multifaceted internal conflict within Sanger Rainsford. Through this conflict, Connell delves into philosophical questions about human nature, morality, and the boundaries of civilized behavior.
Fishing Articles : Assured Strike Fishing Pole Holder
Canoe or Kayak: Which is Better for Fishing?
Equipped Miami Beach Fishing Charters Available
Copyright © www.mycheapnfljerseys.com Outdoor sports All Rights Reserved